Digital Discrimination in India: Is India digitally Inclusive(?).

By;Jadhav Chakradhar,Prashant Kumar Choudhary & Jayantimala Nayak

Rayagada:Discrimination is a multifaceted notion that can have economic, political,social, and digital dimensions in the era of technology.

Digital discrimination in India is concerning, with marginalized communities facing a digital divide and discrimination in the digital realm.

According to a recent report by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), around 70% of rural and 30% of urban households in India do not have access to the internet.

This digital divide is particularly acute among marginalized communities, with only 15% of Dalit households and 10% of Adivasi households accessing the internet. Similarly, only 25% of Muslim families have access to the internet, compared to 42% of Hindu households. The report also highlights the gender divide in digital access, with only 22% of women in India having access to the internet, compared to 33% of men. This gender divide is particularly acute in rural areas, where only 15% of women have access to the internet, compared to 33% of men.

In addition to the digital divide, marginalized communities in India also face online discrimination.

According to a report by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), 16% of Dalits and 14% of Muslims have faced discrimination online. It includes hate speech, cyber bullying, fake news, and misinformation circulation.

It also highlights the impact of online discrimination on marginalized communities.

It notes that online hate speech can lead to offline violence, while cyber bullying can harm mental health. The circulation of fake news and misinformation can also have serious consequences, particularly in public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Digital divide

India Inequality Report, 2022, published by Oxfam India, foregrounds unequal access to the internet and computer/laptops. According to the report, the reach of digital technologies remains limited to largely male, urban, upper-caste, and upper-class households and individuals. Eight per cent of the General caste have a computer or a laptop, whereas less than 1 per cent of the Scheduled Tribes (ST) and 2 per cent of the Scheduled Castes (SC) have one. Across different caste groups, only 4 per cent of students from SC and ST communities had access to a computer and the internet.

As of 2021, a person from General Category is likelier to possess a computer or a laptop than someone from the Scheduled Tribes (ST) category. The gap has widened from 7% since 2018, owing to the adverse effect of the pandemic. Oxfam has also found that a General or an Other Backward Classes (OBC) category person is 4-6% more likely to own a television than a Scheduled Tribe person. However, from 2018 to 2021, the gap between a general person holding a phone and an ST category person owning a phone dropped from 10% to 3%.

These reports have highlighted the growing problem of digital discrimination in India.

They identify the unequal access to digital resources and the discrimination faced by marginalized communities in India. The digital divide in India is widening, with many marginalized communities lacking access to digital resources such as smart phones, computers and the internet. It has led to a situation where these communities are excluded from the benefits of the digital economy including access to education, healthcare and job opportunities.

The reports note that these practices disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including Dalits, Adivasis and Muslims. These studies and reports call for urgent action to address the issue of digital discrimination in India.

They recommend that the government bridge the digital divide by providing access to digital resources to marginalized communities.

They also suggest stricter enforcement of laws to address online hate speech, cyber bullying and the circulation of fake news and misinformation.

It requires greater awareness among citizens about cyber menaces with intended governmental intervention.

Experts have also weighed in on the issue, highlighting the need for a multi-pronged approach to address digital discrimination in India. It includes bridging the digital divide and addressing the social and cultural factors contributing to digital discrimination between scheduled and non-scheduled groups.

Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach is a philosophical framework that emphasizes the importance of focusing on people’s abilities to achieve what they value, rather than solely on their income or material possessions. Sen argues that a person’s capabilities are influenced by a range of factors, including education, health, social status and access to resources. In the context of digital discrimination, the Capability Approach can be useful in identifying the ways in which discriminatory practices can limit people’s access to digital resources and opportunities, such as the internet, online education, and digital job markets.

For example, if a group of people lacks access to the internet, they may be unable to access important information or participate in online social and economic activities, which could limit their opportunities to achieve what they value.

The digital divide can have a detrimental impact on the economy by exacerbating income inequality and limiting opportunities for career advancement. Individuals who lack access to digital resources and training are at a disadvantage in the job market and their inability to contribute to the economy can hinder a country’s competitiveness, economic development increase the income gap between rich and poor.

This can lead companies to outsource jobs that require advanced digital skills to other regions, depriving the country of potential revenue. Ultimately, this can result in a higher poverty rate and adversely affect the overall financial health of the nation.The dream of “Digital India” can only be achieved if we set our priorities in the right direction to take along all the communities, including the marginalized ones.